Matt Wetmore

Using custom Pandoc writers with Hakyll

Posted on March 16, 2015
  1. Literally two posts about math.

  2. I do not.

For the past few years, I’ve used Octopress to maintain a small1 Github-pages blog about math. However, getting LaTeX and Markdown to coexist peacefully was a hassle that consumed a night or two, and Octopress seemed more feature-rich than I needed. So recently, I decided to switch to Hakyll, a static site generator written in Haskell. Hakyll is powered by Pandoc, which has an awesome Markdown parser with built-in support for math. Also I convinced myself I knew enough Haskell that it would be an easy transition2.

  1. See here for an example.

  2. Told you I don’t know Haskell

I wanted to display footnotes to the right of where they are mentioned, like in Edward Tufte’s books3. Pandoc works by parsing different formats into a common format (a “Pandoc”), which it can then write into a number of different outputs, like HTML, Markdown, or a LaTeX document. My original plan of modifying Pandoc’s HTML writer didn’t work4, but I learned that Pandoc supports custom writers written in Lua. I managed to write a lua script which could output the necessary HTML for my sidenotes, but then I needed to get it working with Hakyll, which I thought would be pretty simple.

  1. Beyond “A monad is just a monoid in the category of endofunctors”.

Anyway, after a wonderful week of learning how monads actually work5 I managed to figure it out. So if you’d like to use a custom writer for Pandoc with Hakyll, here’s how. In site.hs, or whatever your main Hakyll file is, add a new function:

customWriterCompilerWith :: (WriterOptions -> Pandoc -> IO String)
                         -> ReaderOptions -> WriterOptions
                         -> Compiler (Item String)
customWriterCompilerWith customWriter ropt wopt = do
    pandoc <- readPandocWith ropt <$> getResourceBody
    withItemBody (unsafeCompiler . customWriter wopt) pandoc
  1. This is part of the Pandoc API; here are the docs and here is where it’s defined

This gives us a new Pandoc compiler after we pass it a custom Pandoc writer created with writeCustom6. We can use it like so:

sidenoteCompilerWith :: ReaderOptions -> WriterOptions -> Compiler (Item String)
sidenoteCompilerWith = customWriterCompilerWith $ writeCustom "sidenote.lua"

Now we can use sidenoteCompilerWith to define a compiler we can use in our route definitions, by passing reader and writer options.

How it works

Hakyll’s unsafeCompiler, which is used elsewhere to allow you to use arbitrary unix programs as compilers, does the heavy lifting here, by fixing the first stumbling block when trying to use a custom writer: the other Pandoc writers Hakyll uses have type WriterOptions -> Pandoc -> String , but check out the type for a custom writer:

writeCustom "sidenote.lua" :: WriterOptions -> Pandoc -> IO String
  1. Abstract Syntax Tree

Since the behaviour of the writer comes from a file which Pandoc first needs to open and read, the resulting custom writer is tainted with the impurity of IO . So we live dangerously and invoke the unsafeCompiler, of type IO a -> Compiler a , so that the composition unsafeCompiler . customWriter wopt takes in a Pandoc (the AST7 from a parsed document) and gives us back a Compiler String . However, when Hakyll passes around data such as the Markdown file containing a post, or the resulting Pandoc representation of a post, it does so with a functor Item , which carries a unique identifier for the data as it changes representations. So we need to lift our function to something of type Item Pandoc -> Compiler (Item String)

The Hakyll function withItemBody is just the function we need for this; as you can see in the definition of customWriterCompilerWith above, we use this function to process the parsed Item Pandoc we’re given and generate output from our custom writer.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Dom Charley-Roy for proofreading this post.

  1. Literally two posts about math.

  2. I do not.

  3. See here for an example.

  4. Told you I don’t know Haskell

  5. Beyond “A monad is just a monoid in the category of endofunctors”.

  6. This is part of the Pandoc API; here are the docs and here is where it’s defined

  7. Abstract Syntax Tree

Comments